Homeopathy: Medicine for the 21st Century
Defending Choice in Medicine
H:MC21 is a charity established to counter the unfounded propaganda against homeopathy by informing the public of the facts about homeopathy and its historical and scientific relationship to orthodox medicine.
It will do this through research, publication and campaigning.
Clicking on the links below will take you directly to various aspects of our campaign
Publications
Charity no. 1124711
Registered address: Poppyseed Cottage,
High Street, Stoke Ferry, Norfolk PE33 9SF
Homeopathy: Medicine for the 21st Century is based in the UK and exists to campaign for homeopathy and to provide access to information and research for homeopaths, patients and others interested in supporting diversity in medical approaches.
As part of our work we provide information about the unscientific nature of the attacks on homeopathy, and on this site, on our allied one (www.homeopathyworkedforme.org), and in our newsletter we provide arguments, information and research for those who want to defend homeopathy.
200 pieces of Medicine legislation are being consoidated and simplified by the MHRA. if the proposals go into force as they stand:You would no longer able to get homeopathic medicines by phone or onlineHomeopaths would not be able to dispense or prescribe many of their medicinesPatients would have to get some homeopathic medicines personally at a handful of licenced homeopathic pharmacies in Britain
H:MC21 called a lobby of Parliament on 4 July 2012
Pictures and a report on the lobby are available here.
This issue is not just about homeopathy but about defending choice in medicine. If a safe medicine used by 10% of the UK population can be made impossible to access, then other treatments will follow.
For more information about the issues click here.
Click here for more information on action you can take.
A new leaflet is available which provides an overview of the key arguments relating to the attacks on homeopathy, showing that they lack any medical or scientific validity. It covers the importance of the Swiss HTA; the history of the attacks on homeopathy; and the problems with RCTs.
"There is no argument against homeopathy which stands up to scientific scrutiny. They are simply slogans, distortions and downright lies."
Just click on the image or here to download the leaflet.
The references are available here.
William Alderson, one of the founders of H:MC21, won the 2012 Society of Homeopaths' Outstanding Achievement Award for his contribution to homeopathy.
Zofia Dymitr, Chairwoman of the Society's Board described William as a "force for the good of homeopathy". You only have to look at this website and the numerous reports, critiques and studies which can be downloaded to get some idea of why. His enormous commitment over the last 4 years and more has been invaluable in giving confidence to homeopaths and patients, and in exposing the hypocrisy of homeopathy's critics. Read more ...
H:MC21's critique of Trick or Treatment? by Simon Singh and Edzard Ernst is still available here. Trick or Treatment? also had so many flaws that is was not scientifically reliable, but many of its arguments continue to be used by others as though they were still credible.
For more information click here.
New praise for Halloween Science has been published in Dirty Medicine: The Handbook (London: Slingshot Publications, 2011). Its author has said that:
Halloween Science, is exceptional and brilliantly titled
and
This is undoubtedly how writing should be used, as a weapon
Homeopathy In Healthcare is the first publication in English of the health technology assessment (HTA) of homeopathy commissioned by the Swiss government.
This HTA concluded:
“that the individual CAM interventions, especially homeopathy, were effective, under Swiss conditions safe and, as far as could be judged from the trial situation, also cost-efficient”.
Homeopathy In Healthcare also explicitly rejects the meta-analysis by Shang et al. published in the Lancet in 2005. This meta-analysis has been the key element in most of the attacks on homeopathy since then, despite the fact that it was exposed as unreliable within a year of publication. The research on which the meta-analysis was based was commissioned for the Swiss HTA, so the rejection of Shang's conclusions by the authors of the HTA is a damning indictment indeed.
William Alderson has reviewed this book for H:MC21.
You are viewing the text version of this site.
To view the full version please install the Adobe Flash Player and ensure your web browser has JavaScript enabled.
Need help? check the requirements page.